The Candorville Courier: Democrats on Bush on Osama

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Democrats on Bush on Osama

The Democrats have created yet another simple, effective advertisement. I wonder how long it'll take them to apologize for it.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...: Huh? "Yes, but?" Yes, but what? First Bush is concerned, then he's not, and then right before an election he gets all concerned again. How can you "yes, but" that observation?; September 20, 2006 7:45 AM
Anonymous said...: "Style (matter of preference) with the binLadenbinLadens strikes me as the style of those who say "hey, look at this neat feature on the video editor." "

I forgot to add that I thought the same thing, until I noticed the "Osama" counter at the bottom of the image.; September 20, 2006 7:46 AM
Anonymous said...: Invade Pakistan? Y'know, I think we don't have the political capital to pull that off. But if we'd done it right after Afghanistan instead of going into Iraq, the world probably would have understood and Democrats like me would've been all for it, as long as we left immediately after catching Bin Laden and didn't become an occupier.

What Dems have always complained about is that Iraq had nothing to do with Bin Laden or 9-11. Pakistan is a totally different story.; September 20, 2006 9:00 AM
Doug said...: They can't go too hard after Bin Laden. They need a boogeyman to hold over our heads.; September 22, 2006 10:57 AM
Anonymous said...: Goddamn ridiculous. I can't believe I voted for that m-f'er. TWICE. I can't wait until November.; September 22, 2006 7:49 PM
Doug said...: I only voted once. Then I saw how bad he did "freeing Iraq."

Bush and his dog Rummy couldn't plan a way to maintain peace if they had it mailed to them by Sun Tzu.; September 24, 2006 11:14 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)